Trump Pulls Back on Housing Bill That Would Have Barred Fed CBDC Until 2030
President Donald Trump declined to sign the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, shelving a measure that would have prohibited the US Federal Reserve from issuing or creating a central bank digital currency until 2030. The…
HONG KONG— June 25, 2026
President Donald Trump declined to sign the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, shelving a measure that would have prohibited the US Federal Reserve from issuing or creating a central bank digital currency until 2030. The cancellation removes what would have been one of the most concrete near-term legislative constraints on Federal Reserve digital currency development, while leaving the regulatory treatment of stablecoins in a separate lane.
A Housing Bill With a Digital Currency Rider
The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act was a housing-focused piece of legislation, but it carried a significant financial technology provision: a hard prohibition on the Federal Reserve issuing or creating any CBDC through the end of the decade. The carve-out is as notable as the ban itself — certain stablecoins were explicitly exempted from the restriction, a distinction that preserves the operating space for private digital dollar instruments even as it would have frozen the central bank out of the field.
The pairing of a CBDC ban with housing legislation underscores how digital currency policy has become a negotiating chip embedded across legislative vehicles, rather than a standalone statutory effort. The provision's placement in a housing bill also meant its fate was tied to the broader politics surrounding that measure.
What Cancellation Leaves Open
With Trump's signature withheld, the Federal Reserve faces no new statutory clock on digital currency development. The central bank has previously described its CBDC research as exploratory and has not announced plans to issue one, but the cancelled bill would have codified a moratorium through 2030 regardless of where internal Fed deliberations land.
The stablecoin exemption in the original text signals that legislators drafting the provision drew a deliberate line between public and private digital money. By excluding certain stablecoins from the ban, the bill's authors were effectively endorsing continued private-sector issuance while targeting the Federal Reserve specifically. That policy distinction now goes unlegislated, leaving both the CBDC question and the stablecoin framework to be resolved through whatever measures advance next.
The Macro Read
The episode illustrates the fragility of attaching financial regulation to must-pass or high-profile legislative packages. A CBDC moratorium that arrived as a rider on housing legislation was always exposed to the political fortunes of the host bill. For markets watching the US digital currency landscape, the signal from Trump's cancellation is less about any reversal on CBDC skepticism and more about the absence, for now, of a firm statutory boundary around Federal Reserve digital currency activity.
Related reading
Source · 來源